Hopefully you all caught the Hereford and Charolais grooming competition! Check back at 2pm on the Grey's Channel tab for Shorthorn and Simmental groominhg competitions!



4pm is the Jackpot Yearling Heifer competition! Don't miss out!


Monday, 16 May 2011

Alberta and the Oil Sands

Although this article isn't about beef I find it extremely well written. Everyone should read it!!

 
This is the typical Alberta view on our relationship with the ROC (rest
of Canada ), excluding B.C. and Saskatchewan of course.
Fascinating article by Lisa Corbella of the Calgary Herald.
 
Something has to give !!
 
Quebec and the Fairy Godmother
 
Today, let's have some fun and play Fairy Godmother to
Quebec . Let's grant the province the wish it articulated in Copenhagen.. Wave
the magic wand and poof, wish granted. Shut down Alberta 's oilsands,except,
since it's Quebec making the wish, we have to call it tarsands, even
though it's not tar they use to run their Bombardier planes, trains and
Skidoos.
 
Ah, at last! The blight on Canada 's reputation shut down.
All those dastardly workers from across Canada living in Fort McMurray ,
Calgary and Edmonton out of jobs, including those waitresses, truck
drivers, nurses, teachers, doctors, pilots, engineers etc. They can all go on
Employment insurance like Ontario autoworkers and Quebec parts makers!
Closing down Alberta 's oil industry would immediately stop
the production of 1.8 million barrels of oil a day. Supply and demand
being what it is, oil prices will go up and therefore the cost at the pump
will go up, too, increasing the cost of everything else.
 
But lost jobs in Alberta and across the country along with
higher gas prices are a small price to pay to save the world and not
"embarrass" Quebecers on the world stage. Not to worry though, Saudi
Arabia, Libya and Nigeria can come to the rescue. You know, the guys who pump
money into al-Qaida and help Osama bin Laden target those Van Doos fighting in
Afghanistan . Bloody oil is so much nicer than dirty tarsands oil.
 
Shutting down the oilsands will reduce Canada 's greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions by 38.4 Mt (megatonnes). Hooray! It's so fun to be a
Fairy Godmother! While that sounds like a lot, Canada only produces two
per cent of the world's man-made GHGs and the oilsands only produce five per
cent of Canada 's total emissions or 0.1 per cent of the world's
emissions.
 
By comparison, the U.S. produces 20.2 per cent of the world's
GHG emissions, 27 per cent of which comes from coal-fired
electricity.
 
The 530-square-kilometre piece of land currently disturbed
by the oilsands (which is smaller than the John F. Kennedy Space Center
at Cape Canaveral , Fla. at 570 square kilometres) must be reclaimed by
law and will return to Alberta 's 381,000 square kilometres of boreal forest, a
huge carbon sink.
 
Quebec , of course, has clean hydro power, but more than
13,000 square kilometres were drowned for the James Bay hydroelectric
project, permanently removing that forest from acting as a carbon sink.
 
But Fairy Godmother is digressing all over the place. While
the oilsands only produce five per cent of Canada 's GHGs, it
contributes much more to Canada 's economy. After all, oil and gas make up
one-quarter of the value on the TSX alone. Alberta is also the largest net contributor
per capita by far to Confederation and there are only two more -- B.C. and
Ontario .
 
Quebec hasn't made a net contribution to the rest of Canada
for a very long time. This is not to be critical (after all, Fairy
Godmothers never criticize), it's just a fact. In 2009, Albertans paid
$40.46 billion in income, corporate and other taxes to the federal
government and received back just $19.35 billion in services and goods from
the feds. That means the rest of Canada got $21.1 billion from
Albertans or $5,742 for each and every Alberta man, woman and child. In 2007 (the
last year national figures are available), Alberta sent a net contribution of
$19.49 billion to the ROC or $5,553 per Albertan -- more than three
times what every Ontarian contributes at $1,757. Quebecers, on the other hand,
each received $627 net or a total of $8 billion, money which was
designed to help "equalize" social programs across the country. Except, that's not
what is happening. Quebec has more generous social programs like (nearly)
free university tuition (paid for mostly by Albertans) and cheap provincial
day care (paid for mostly by Albertans).
 
But in this Fairy Godmother world, poof, those delightful
unequal programs have now disappeared! Quel dommage!
 
The July 2009 Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI)
report states that between 2008 and 2032, the oilsands will account for
172,000 person-years of employment in Ontario during the construction
phase, plus 640,000 for operations over the 25-year period. For Quebec , the
oilsands will account for 84,000 person-years of employment during the
construction phase, plus 292,000 for operations over the 25-year period.
 
In total, the oilsands are expected to add $1.7 trillion to
Canada 's GDP over the next 25 years.
 
Wave wand and Poof, Jobs, gone! So, now that the oil
industry has shut down and left Alberta , Alberta has become a have-not
province and so has every other province. Equality at last! Hugo Chavez
will be so pleased.
 
Meeting our Copenhagen targets suddenly looks possible, as
most of us can't afford to drive our cars or buy anything but
necessities, so manufacturers have closed their doors and emissions are way down.
 
The dream of many Quebecers to form their own nation and
separate from Canada has died at last. Alas, in Alberta , separatist
sentiment has risen dramatically, citizens vote to separate and the oil
and gas industry returns.
 
Albertans start to pocket that almost $6,000 for each person
that used to get sent elsewhere and now their kids get free tuition.
Fairy Godmother's work is done. Wish granted. Quebecers must now sign up for a
foreign worker visas to work in Alberta to send their cheques back home
so junior can start saving up to pay for college.
 
Licia Corbella is editorial page editor of The Calgary Herald.

2 comments:

  1. I like to buy my meat locally, especially at farmers markets. And I try to stock my freezer before winter! I was curious though I thought all beef had hormones? You can't buy hormone free beef can you?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey,
    So I need to re-address my first statement.First of all well done on buying locally! So although all beef animals have their own natural hormones many farmers inject their animals with hormones to speed up growth in animals. The matter is very controversial and their is really no proof either way wether it's good for you or not, it really just comes up to personal opinion. Here's some facts I've taken off the food service warehouse website for you to view:

    Source of the Controversy
    Both sides of the growth hormone debate say there are residual levels of hormones in the food and milk. Those in favor of the hormones contend that these hormones are naturally occurring in humans and animals and therefore, cause no ill effects. And those opposed to growth hormones say they do cause harm to both humans and animals.

    Arguments for Growth Hormones

    •Fewer cows are needed to produce milk. Since rBST is designed to increase a cow’s milk production, fewer cows are needed to produce more milk. This reduces the dairy industries impact on the environment.

    •Beef cows grow faster and leaner. Beef cows can grow 15 to 20% faster than non-treated animals.2 The meat produced is also leaner than conventionally grown animals.

    •Any residual hormones do not harm consumers. If any residual hormones are found in the meat or milk, they are either at too low of levels to cause any response in the human body, or in the case of bST they are dead hormone cells that simply pass through the digestive system.

    •Studies have time and again proven the safety of growth hormones. There are over 2,000 published studies on bST alone, undertaken by different scientists around the world.2 All have documented the quality and healthfulness of milk produced by injected cows.

    Arguments Against Growth Hormones

    •It is unhealthy for the animal. The label used to package the hormone injected into dairy cattle lists nearly two dozen side effects that can pose risks to the animal. Among the list is mastitis, a painful bacterial infection in the cow’s udder.

    •Dairy cow growth hormones are linked to cancer in humans. The number of residual hormones found in cow milk is as much as 10 times higher than non-treated cows.3 Several studies have linked these high levels of residual hormones to an increased risk of breast, colon, prostate and lung cancer in humans.

    •Growth hormones can cause early maturity in humans. In the late 1970s, the U.S. banned a growth hormone (DES) known to cause cancer. Rather than destroying the leftovers, the manufacturer shipped remaining hormones to Puerto Rico where the farmers liberally injected their chicken, pork and beef herds. Shortly thereafter, thousands of children as young as two were found to have reached full sexual maturity. The cause was residual DES in meat the children had consumed.

    •Milk from treated dairy cows may have residual antibiotics. Cows treated with bST have a higher rate of udder infections which the farmer treats with antibiotics. The antibiotics do show up in that cow’s milk, and if the farmer does not allow a sufficient withdrawal period, the entire milk supply could become contaminated.

    ReplyDelete